Opinion
Argued May 26, 1892
Decided June 14, 1892
J. Rider Cady for appellant.
Emory A. Chase for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except FINCH, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rouse v. Catskill and New York Steamboat Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1892
133 N.Y. 679 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Rouse v. Catskill and New York Steamboat Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1892
133 N.Y. 679 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Rouse v. Catskill and New York Steamboat Company
Case Details
Full title:BEULAH ROUSE, an Infant, by Guardian, Appellant, v . THE CATSKILL AND NEW…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 14, 1892
Citations
133 N.Y. 679 (N.Y. 1892)
45 N.Y. St. Rptr. 931
Citing Cases
Gardner v. Bentley
It is the contention of the defendant that the word "premises" means land only and may not be applied to…
Wood Preserving Corporation v. State Tax CommissionA telegraph, telephone or electric line would not be classified as a building, and materials entering into…