From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothman Schneider, Inc. v. Beckerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 1958
5 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

April 22, 1958


Order denying defendants' motion to vacate plaintiff's notice to examine defendants before trial modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to eliminate the items of examination and to provide that the examination proceed with respect to the relevant material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings in the action, as provided by rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice, as last amended, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. It is not necessary to consider the objections to the items of examination, since in the light of the recent amendment to rule 121-a the examination may proceed thereunder. The defendant, Herman Lerner, will appear for examination at Special Term, Part II, of the Supreme Court, New York County, on May 5, 1958, at 11:00 A.M. Settle order.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Frank and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Rothman Schneider, Inc. v. Beckerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 22, 1958
5 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Rothman Schneider, Inc. v. Beckerman

Case Details

Full title:ROTHMAN SCHNEIDER, INC., Respondent, v. SAM BECKERMAN et al., Individually…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Suchoff v. Crystal Paper Box Co.

The movants' contention that the testimony sought to be taken is not material and necessary, is clearly…

Kipbea Baking Co., Inc. v. Strauss

On the appeal by defendants Strauss and Simonetti: Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See…