From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rothemeier v. Holzheimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 26, 1941
263 App. Div. 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

November 26, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Montgomery County.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The plaintiff, on November 16, 1938, while a customer in the department store of the defendants, slipped on and fell down the stairs, and suffered injuries for which she has recovered this judgment. Her testimony was to the effect that wax was left in quite large quantities on the stairs, and after falling her clothes were covered with wax and there were hunks of it on her shoes, and that the foreign substance on the stairs was what caused her to fall. No question is raised about the amount of the judgment. The appellant raises the question that plaintiff failed to maintain the burden of proof to establish the defendant's negligence and that there was no question to go to the jury. Examination of the record establishes that there was a question to be submitted to the jury and there is evidence in the record to support the finding of the jury. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Rothemeier v. Holzheimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 26, 1941
263 App. Div. 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Rothemeier v. Holzheimer

Case Details

Full title:MARIE L. ROTHEMEIER, Respondent, v. SOLOMON HOLZHEIMER and P. DATER SHAUL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1941

Citations

263 App. Div. 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Palenius v. M.H. Fishman Co., Inc.

The dismissal was error. ( Huth v. Woolworth Co., 225 App. Div. 656, affd. 250 N.Y. 577; Laundrie v. Grant…

Conroy v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.

Defendant denied the existence of the floor condition complained of, and denied that the floor was waxed. We…