From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Pakstis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2004
13 A.D.3d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4956

December 16, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered October 1, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, partially granted plaintiff's motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Williams, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


The grant of discovery in this matter was a proper exercise of discretion under CPLR 408, inasmuch as the data requested were material to the action ( see Matter of Goldstein v. McGuire, 84 AD2d 697) and unavailable by other means.


Summaries of

Roth v. Pakstis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2004
13 A.D.3d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Roth v. Pakstis

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD ROTH, Respondent, v. KAREN A. PAKSTIS, as Assistant Deputy…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Schriro

The disclosure ordered consists of limited, discrete documentary evidence and identification of witnesses,…

Smilow v. Ulrich

On granting leave to serve a document demand, courts contemporaneously consider the propriety of compelling…