Opinion
No. 2006-5121.
November 28, 2006.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it isORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rotech Healthcare v. U.S.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 28, 2006
214 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
Summaries of
Rotech Healthcare v. U.S.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 28, 2006
214 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
Case details for
Rotech Healthcare v. U.S.
Case Details
Full title:ROTECH HEALTHCARE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Date published: Nov 28, 2006
Citations
214 F. App'x 973 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
Citing Cases
Metropolitan Van Storage v. U.S.
The Federal Circuit has stated that the rule of contra proferentem also applies in a bid protest. See Blue…
Palladian Partners, Inc. v. United StatesConsistent with this mandatory language, the Court of Federal Claims has recognized that a challenge to an…