From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 24, 2009
14 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D08-4880.

June 24, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, John M. Merrett, J.

Appellant Eugene V. Ross, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Christine A. Guard, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), claiming that the trial court sentenced him illegally when it sentenced him under the 1983 sentencing guidelines, adopted by the Florida Supreme Court, before the Florida legislature adopted them on July 1, 1984. See Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla. 1989); Wright v. State, 941 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Because the appellant's motion raises a facially sufficient claim that is not refuted by the record, we reverse and remand for attachment of record portions showing that the appellant's claim has been addressed on the merits, attachment of record portions showing that the appellant affirmatively elected to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines, or resentencing.

REVERSED.

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 24, 2009
14 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Ross v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eugene V. ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 24, 2009

Citations

14 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Cummings v. State

We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach the portion of the record conclusively…