From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Oakland Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 21, 2012
Case No.: 11-10787 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 11-10787

05-21-2012

FOURIER ROSS, Plaintiff, v. OAKLAND UNIVERSITY, Defendant,


Honorable Victoria A. Roberts


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Oakland University's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #21).

The Court denies this motion; there are material questions of fact for a jury to decide. These questions of fact include but are not limited to:

Whether Plaintiff's position was correctly described and classified, what his job duties were; whether he qualified for a higher salary, whether the Mercer report was used to treat Plaintiff differently from similarly situated Caucasians; and, whether Defendant's articulated reasons for the actions taken with respect to Plaintiff, are pretextual.

Defendant's Motion is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED.

_________________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

Linda Vertriest

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Ross v. Oakland Univ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 21, 2012
Case No.: 11-10787 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Ross v. Oakland Univ.

Case Details

Full title:FOURIER ROSS, Plaintiff, v. OAKLAND UNIVERSITY, Defendant,

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 11-10787 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2012)