From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosendale v. McNulty

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Jan 8, 1902
23 R.I. 465 (R.I. 1902)

Opinion

January 8, 1902.

PRESENT: Stiness, C.J., Tillinghast and Rogers, JJ.

(1) Depositions. Commissioners. Incriminating Answers. A deponent cannot be excused from answering questions, on the ground that her answers would criminate herself, where the questions do not show that such a result would be possible.

APPLICATION for a writ of attachment against a deponent who refused to answer certain questions before a commissioner on the ground that her answers would criminate her. Certified by commissioner to the court, under rule 34 of the Rules in Equity.

T.M. O'Reilly, for complainants.

J.M. Brennan, for respondent.


The defendant, Mary McNulty, has refused to answer questions put to her in taking her deposition, upon the ground that her answers would criminate herself. The questions do not show that such a result would be possible, and hence the questions should have been answered. A writ of attachment against said Mary McNulty will issue, unless at such time as shall be fixed by the master, within twenty days from this date, she shall appear before him and answer the questions which she refused to answer and shall also within that time pay the costs upon this citation, to be taxed by the clerk, and an additional sum of ten dollars for counsel's fee for complainant's counsel, which sums are not to be recovered back in any event.


Summaries of

Rosendale v. McNulty

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Jan 8, 1902
23 R.I. 465 (R.I. 1902)
Case details for

Rosendale v. McNulty

Case Details

Full title:MOSES ROSENDALE et al. vs. MARY McNULTY

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: Jan 8, 1902

Citations

23 R.I. 465 (R.I. 1902)
50 A. 850

Citing Cases

In re Application of Berman

He cannot sit silently by and refuse to answer without giving a reason for his silence. ( Rosendale v.…

State v. Pari

Although it is true that the privilege should be upheld if the answer to a question would create a link in a…