Summary
affirming summary judgment against experienced softball player who "assumed the risk that he might be injured by a sliding opposing player"
Summary of this case from Kelly v. McCarrickOpinion
December 15, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff, an experienced softball player, was injured when, while playing first base in a league softball game, the defendant slid into him after hitting a ground ball to the shortstop. In his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant argued that sliding into first base was a foreseeable event during a softball game and that the plaintiff had assumed the risk of the injury at issue. The plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment arguing that the nature of the slide rendered it unforeseeable, and the risk of injury therefrom was not assumed. We now affirm the dismissal of the complaint.
The plaintiff, as a voluntary participant in the softball game at issue, assumed the risk that he might be injured by a sliding opposing player ( see, Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471; Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432; Maddox v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 270; Totino v. Nassau County Council of Boy Scouts, 213 A.D.2d 710; Hoffman v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 716; Robinson v. Town of Babylon, 166 A.D.2d 434). Further, upon review of the record, including a videotape of the play in question, we find that the plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the nature of the slide otherwise rendered it actionable ( see, Turcotte v. Fell, supra, at 441 ["flagrant infractions unrelated to the normal method of playing the game and done without any competitive purpose" may be actionable]; see, e.g., Nabozny v. Barnhill, 31 Ill. App.3d 212, 334 N.E.2d 258; Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, 601 F.2d 516, cert denied 444 U.S. 931). Indeed, sliding into first base is expressly permitted by the rules of play.
Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.