From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1947
272 App. Div. 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

November 3, 1947.


As transferee of shares of stock, plaintiff seeks judgment directing appellants to account to him for the management and operation of the corporate property and that they be directed to deliver to him certificates of stock now in their possession. Order denying motion of appellants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The existence of the restrictive agreement was conclusively established and, in view of the admitted circumstances, no issue is presented with respect to the application of the doctrine of estoppel. Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Rosenberg v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1947
272 App. Div. 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Rosenberg v. Berman

Case Details

Full title:HARRY ROSENBERG, Respondent, v. SAUL BERMAN et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1947

Citations

272 App. Div. 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Levine v. Lafayette Bldg. Corp.

Furthermore, the defendant thereby further manifested, in my judgment, that it adopted such "Agreement of…

M. N. Landau Stores, Inc. v. Daigle

" See also Berman v. Rosenberg, 115 Me. 19, 97 A. 6; Annot. 122 A.L.R. 1217, 1221, 1247; Annot. 165 A.L.R.…