From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1953
282 App. Div. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

June 23, 1953.

Present — Dore, J.P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed and the motion for discovery and inspection denied. We think the extraordinary remedy of discovery and inspection is unnecessary in the circumstances in this case. Application may be made for modification of the order for examination before trial so as to enable plaintiff to compel production of books and records before the referee named by Special Term, who will supervise the use of same for the limited purposes provided in section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Rose v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1953
282 App. Div. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Rose v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR H. ROSE, Respondent, v. BILLY ROSE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Rose v. Rose

This court has heretofore expressed the view that an examination of defendant is indicated on this record. (…