Summary
holding that Delaware law applied in determining the validity of arbitration agreement in credit card agreement
Summary of this case from Coleman v. Assurant, Inc.Opinion
3:05-cv-00522-HDM-VPC.
May 30, 2006
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#23) filed on May 8, 2006, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that this court enter an order granting defendant's motion to compel arbitration (#14). No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed and the time for filing any objections has expired. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#23). Therefore, defendant's motion to compel arbitration (#14) is GRANTED.
All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice to re-file.
This case shall be administratively closed.
It is so ORDERED.