From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose-Rankin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 29, 2003
No. 03-03-00254-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00254-CR.

Filed: August 29, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Hays County, 22nd Judicial District No. Cr-99-580, Honorable Charles R. Ramsay, Judge Presiding. Dismissed for Want of Prosecution.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices B.A. SMITH and PURYEAR.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The clerk's fee has not been paid and the clerk's record has not been filed. See Tex.R.App.P. 35.3(a). The Court notified appellant's attorney that the appeal would be dismissed if the clerk's record was not paid for by June 16, 2003. The Court received no response to this notice and payment has not been made. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. rule 37.3(b).


Summaries of

Rose-Rankin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 29, 2003
No. 03-03-00254-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2003)
Case details for

Rose-Rankin v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW JON ROSE-RANKIN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 29, 2003

Citations

No. 03-03-00254-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 29, 2003)

Citing Cases

Milligan v. Gwinn's Adm'r

The Annotation shows that the weight of authority is in favor of the validity of such an agreement. The…