Roosa v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Full title: VANESSA M. ROOSA, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 3, 2013

Case No. 5:12cv2556 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 3, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 5:12cv2556

12-03-2013

VANESSA M. ROOSA, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

ORDER

JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

On October 12, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) (Dkt.#1). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. On November 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed (Dkt. #17).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6^th Cir.1981).

Therefore, Magistrate Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the Commissioner's decision is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE