From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roofire Alarm v. Underwriters' Laboratories

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 19, 1960
284 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 14060.

October 19, 1960.

Samuel M. Chambliss, Chambliss, Chambliss Hodge, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant.

Jere T. Tipton, Miller, Martin, Hitching Tipton, Chattanooga, Tenn., and Edward H. Hickey, Bell, Boyd, Marshall Lloyd, Chicago, Ill., on brief, for appellee.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the trial court, sustaining the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of District Judge Darr, adequately expressed, the order of the United States District Court is affirmed. 188 F. Supp. 753.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Roofire Alarm v. Underwriters' Laboratories

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 19, 1960
284 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1960)
Case details for

Roofire Alarm v. Underwriters' Laboratories

Case Details

Full title:ROOFIRE ALARM COMPANY, Appellant, v. UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 1960

Citations

284 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1960)