From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 3, 2009
No. CIV 08-544-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 3, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV 08-544-TUC-CKJ.

December 3, 2009


ORDER


On November 4, 2009, Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 12] in which he recommended that this Court remand the case pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for the purpose of consideration of the new evidence. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge recommended that this Court remand the case for further findings consistent with the Report. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that objections were to be served and filed within ten days of being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed within the time provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 12] is ADOPTED;

2. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for the purpose of consideration of the new evidence.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this case and shall then close its file in this matter.


Summaries of

Romero v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 3, 2009
No. CIV 08-544-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Romero v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JESUS ROMERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 3, 2009

Citations

No. CIV 08-544-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Dec. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Staib v. Colvin

13 WL 785522, at *8 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2013) (remanding for reconsideration of the Plaintiff's residual…

Sandoval v. Astrue

See, e.g., Shafer v. Astrue, 518 F.3d 1067, 1072 (9th Cir. 2008); Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028,…