From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Sep 30, 2009
Case No: 08-2584-JWL (D. Kan. Sep. 30, 2009)

Summary

In Romero, the question of onset date was reasonably suggested by the testimony at the hearing and should have been followed up by the ALJ.

Summary of this case from King v. Colvin

Opinion

Case No: 08-2584-JWL.

September 30, 2009


ORDER


On September 14, 2009, a Report and Recommendation (doc. #12) was issued by the Honorable Gerald B. Cohn, Magistrate Judge. The time in which to file objections has passed and to date no objections have been filed. The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds that it should be adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the Report and Recommendation (doc. #12) is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to immediately award benefits based on an onset date of disability of July 2, 2000.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Romero v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Sep 30, 2009
Case No: 08-2584-JWL (D. Kan. Sep. 30, 2009)

In Romero, the question of onset date was reasonably suggested by the testimony at the hearing and should have been followed up by the ALJ.

Summary of this case from King v. Colvin
Case details for

Romero v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE ROMERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

Case No: 08-2584-JWL (D. Kan. Sep. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

King v. Colvin

(Pl. Br. 11) (citing Romero v. Astrue, No. 08-2584-JWL, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105092 at *27 (D. Kan. Sept.…

McKinsey v. Colvin

Plaintiff's testimony does not support the ALJ's conclusion that plaintiff could lift. To the extent the ALJ…