From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romero-Rodriguez v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 29, 2021
311 So. 3d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-4501

01-29-2021

John ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Rachael E. Reese and Casey M. Burns, of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Rachael E. Reese and Casey M. Burns, of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and MORRIS and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Romero-Rodriguez v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Jan 29, 2021
311 So. 3d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Romero-Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 29, 2021

Citations

311 So. 3d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Romero-Rodriguez v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corrs.

The appellate court affirmed the denial of relief without opinion. Romero-Rodriguez v. State, 311 So.3d 13 …