From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romanous v. Romanous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1992
181 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 30, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The husband contends that the award to the wife of pendente lite maintenance in the amount of $75 per week and pendente lite child support in the amount of $175 per week is excessive since he is incarcerated and thus has insufficient income to meet those obligations. The husband's incarceration, however, is the result of a manslaughter conviction for having killed the wife's brother. Accordingly, the husband may not seek to evade his support obligations based on this self-imposed hardship (see, Matter of Knights v Knights, 71 N.Y.2d 865). Rather, his remedy for alleviating perceived inequities in the pendente lite support order is to expeditiously proceed to trial (see, Guiry v Guiry, 159 A.D.2d 556; Wesler v Wesler, 133 A.D.2d 627).

We have reviewed the husband's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Romanous v. Romanous

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1992
181 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Romanous v. Romanous

Case Details

Full title:DOLPHINE M. ROMANOUS, Respondent, v. AMIJIAN B. ROMANOUS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
581 N.Y.S.2d 410

Citing Cases

Laubenheimer v. Laubenheimer

More recent cases in the intermediate appellate level follow Knights rather than Foster. See Romanous v.…

Ballinger v. Wingate

Yrayta v. Bridgeforth, sub nom. Commissioner of Human Resources v. Bridgeforth, supra, 42 Conn. Sup. 129.…