From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romano v. Romano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 4, 1997
690 So. 2d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No.: 96-2414

Opinion filed April 4, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lawrence R. Kirkwood, Judge.

Robert J. Wheelock of Robert J. Wheelock, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


The judgment of dissolution of marriage is reversed, except for that portion dissolving the marriage, based upon the trial court's failure to make specific findings of fact mandated by subsection 61.08(1), Florida Statutes. See Kennedy v. Kennedy, 622 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)(en banc); Plyler v. Plyler, 622 So.2d 573 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). In particular, the trial court should make specific findings of fact relative to the award to the wife of a special equity in the marital home, see Robertson v. Robertson, 593 So.2d 491 (Fla. 1991); Woodard v. Woodard, 634 So.2d 782 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), and in ordering the husband to pay the wife's attorney's fees and costs. Plyler. We note the apparent lack of a trial transcript. The trial court may make the requisite findings from its notes, if any, or from a stipulated statement of facts, if the parties can reconstruct the hearing. If neither of these alternatives is available, then an evidentiary hearing should be held.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Romano v. Romano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 4, 1997
690 So. 2d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Romano v. Romano

Case Details

Full title:FRANK M. ROMANO, Appellant, v. ALLISON A. ROMANO, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 4, 1997

Citations

690 So. 2d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

McMullan v. McMullan

This judgment is not reviewable in its present form because it lacks the type of findings necessary for…