From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romani v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
656 F. App'x 356 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-35018

08-03-2016

GLORIA A. ROMANI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DBA Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00382-PA MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon
Owen M. Panner, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 6, 2015 Portland, Oregon Before: BERZON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and SOTO, District Judge.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable James Alan Soto, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. --------

The district court properly entered summary judgment for the defendants and denied Gloria Romani's motion for leave to amend her complaint as futile. Romani argues that the foreclosure sale of her property was invalid because the notice of sale that she received did not identify the proper beneficiary of the trust deed. However, the Oregon Trust Deed Act forbids post-sale challenges based on this technical defect in the notice of sale, for the reasons stated in Woods v. U.S. Bank N.A., ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 2016). See Or. Rev. Stat. § 86.797(1) (formerly § 86.770(1)).

We need not consider whether Romani's appeal is also barred by issue preclusion. For this reason, appellees' motion for judicial notice is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Romani v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 3, 2016
656 F. App'x 356 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Romani v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA A. ROMANI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DBA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 3, 2016

Citations

656 F. App'x 356 (9th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Dawson v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Plaintiff alleges MERS assigned the Note and DOT to BONYM and that BONYM is the Note holder. Compl. ¶¶ 6, 30.…