From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roller v. Stanly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 12, 1951
98 N.E.2d 705 (N.Y. 1951)

Opinion

Argued March 7, 1951

Decided April 12, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, NOVA, J.

Irving L. Weishar for appellant.

Joseph Perlstein and Anthony Barbiero for respondents.


Orders reversed and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that, under the circumstances here present, defendant was not guilty of any actionable misrepresentation and did not violate any fiduciary duty in his purchase of the assets of the partnership. Question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Roller v. Stanly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 12, 1951
98 N.E.2d 705 (N.Y. 1951)
Case details for

Roller v. Stanly

Case Details

Full title:JOHANNA W. ROLLER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 12, 1951

Citations

98 N.E.2d 705 (N.Y. 1951)
98 N.E.2d 705

Citing Cases

Pluchino v. Pluchino

There are no allegations that show such a relationship between the parties as to place respondent in a strict…

Magalnick v. Cohen

In this action plaintiff failed to establish the element of deception which is prerequisite in an action for…