From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 18, 1993
618 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 90-3049.

April 5, 1993. Rehearing Denied June 18, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County; Don T. Sirmons, Judge.

Kimberly F. Pell, Panama City, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Wendy S. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant, Terry Rolison, challenges a restitution order requiring him to pay restitution in the total amount of $27,300.00. Our examination of the record in this cause reveals that the restitution obligation was not a part of the negotiated plea agreement. Since the sentencing disposition did not follow the terms of the plea agreement, the matter must be reversed and remanded for resentencing. Prior to resentencing, if the trial court again determines to exceed the bounds of the plea agreement, appellant must be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea.

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rolison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 18, 1993
618 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Rolison v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY ROLISON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 18, 1993

Citations

618 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Hoskins v. State

Noting that Murray had not moved to withdraw his plea at sentencing, the court held that the issue was not…