From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Villafane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 23, 2013
12-cv-3042 (CBA)(MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2013)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from Vanterpool v. Blackman

Opinion

12-cv-3042 (CBA)(MDG)

07-23-2013

Ervin B. Rogers, Plaintiff, v. Police Officer Jose Villafane, Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

AMON, Chief United States District Judge.

On June 4, 2013, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties were given until June 21, 2013 to file objections to the R&R. No objections have been filed to date. Reviewing the R&R for clear error, the Court hereby adopts Magistrate Go's R&R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2013

Brooklyn, N.Y.

____________

Carol Bagley Amon

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rogers v. Villafane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 23, 2013
12-cv-3042 (CBA)(MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2013)

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from Vanterpool v. Blackman
Case details for

Rogers v. Villafane

Case Details

Full title:Ervin B. Rogers, Plaintiff, v. Police Officer Jose Villafane, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 23, 2013

Citations

12-cv-3042 (CBA)(MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2013)

Citing Cases

Vanterpool v. Blackman

Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Adams, 513 Fed App'x at 66. District courts in…

United States v. Dekattu

The lawsuit against Officer Villafane was dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Rogers v. Villafane, No.…