From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 30, 1999
736 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

following resentencing after vacation of original sentence, trial court, not Department of Corrections, should consider claim for and award credit for time spent in jail awaiting resentencing; such time is considered "pre-sentence jail time"

Summary of this case from Stuart v. State

Opinion

No. 98-2852.

Opinion filed June 30, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County, W.O. Beauchamp, Jr., Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Pamerese Rogers appeals the summary denial of her motion, pursuant to Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850, seeking credit for five days jail time served prior to a resentencing hearing at which her original sentence was vacated and a new sentence was entered. The trial court denied the motion, stating such credit should be sought through the Department of Corrections. We reverse. Section 921.161(1) Fla. Stat. provides that "the court imposing a sentence shall allow a defendant credit for all of the time she or he spent in the county jail before sentence." Therefore, the order entered below is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 30, 1999
736 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

following resentencing after vacation of original sentence, trial court, not Department of Corrections, should consider claim for and award credit for time spent in jail awaiting resentencing; such time is considered "pre-sentence jail time"

Summary of this case from Stuart v. State
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAMERESE D. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 30, 1999

Citations

736 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Stuart v. State

The denial order does not have any record excerpts attached to it in support the court's ruling. The record…