Opinion
5:21-cv-176 (GLS/TWD)
07-14-2021
MEGAN ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER et al., Defendants.
FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Megan Rogers Pro Se
FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Megan Rogers Pro Se
ORDER
Gary L. Sharpe Senior District Judge
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following an Order and Report-Recommendation (R&R) by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks, duly filed June 9, 2021. (Dkt. No. 14.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.
Plaintiff pro se Megan Rogers filed a document in response to the R&R. (Dkt. No. 15.) But that document, much like the amended complaint, is not cogent, and it makes no specific objection to the R&R. The court has reviewed the R&R for clear error, see Almonte v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, No. Civ. 904CV484, 2006 WL 149049, at *5-6 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2006), and finds none. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 13) is DISMISSED; and it is further
ORDERED that the clerk close this case; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules of Practice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.