From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1903
66 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1903)

Opinion

Argued January 20, 1903

Decided February 10, 1903

George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.

L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Pette for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and WERNER, JJ. Absent: VANN, J. Dissenting: CULLEN, J.


Summaries of

Rogers v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1903
66 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1903)
Case details for

Rogers v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:J.S. ROGERS, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 1903

Citations

66 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1903)
66 N.E. 1115

Citing Cases

Thilemann v. City of New York

By its own act in permitting the other contractors to proceed with grading and regulating the very streets…

Mechanics' Bank v. City of New York

By its own act in permitting the other contractors to proceed with grading and regulating the very streets…