Rodriguez v. State

Full title: ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

182 So. 3d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D13–1403.

01-06-2016

Roberto RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broughton v. State, 790 So.2d 1118, 1118–19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that the standard instruction informing the jury that it was “the judge's job to determine a proper sentence” was not misleading even though the State sought to have the defendant designated as a prison releasee reoffender).

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.