From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Greco

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

Summary

In Rodriguez v. Greco, 31 Misc.3d 136(A), 927 N.Y.S.2d 819 (App. Term, 9th & 10th Jud. Dists.2009), the court held that the respondent was a tenant and not licensee and thus service of a 10 day notice upon the respondent was insufficient.

Summary of this case from Carbone v. Hurdle

Opinion

April 13, 2011.


Landlord and Tenant — Existence of Relation. Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law — § 713 (7) (Summary proceeding to recover possession of real propety; grounds where no landlord-tenant relationship exists; licensee of person entitled to possession of property).


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Greco

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2011
31 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

In Rodriguez v. Greco, 31 Misc.3d 136(A), 927 N.Y.S.2d 819 (App. Term, 9th & 10th Jud. Dists.2009), the court held that the respondent was a tenant and not licensee and thus service of a 10 day notice upon the respondent was insufficient.

Summary of this case from Carbone v. Hurdle
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Greco

Case Details

Full title:Rodriguez v. Greco

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2011

Citations

31 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 50696

Citing Cases

Fizzinoglia v. Capozzoli

Occupants remained in possession of the property for years after they had stopped making mortgage payments…

Hok Kwan Chu v. Lee

Petitioners failed to establish that occupants were mere licensees, as there was no proof at trial that…