From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-28

In the Matter of Chan RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Chan Rodriguez, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Chan Rodriguez, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissionerof Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After a search of petitioner's cube produced an allegedly gang-related item in a photo album, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison rule prohibiting the possession of such material. He was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing. Although the penalty was modified upon administrative review, the determination of guilt was otherwise affirmed, prompting the commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, along with the documentary evidence, hearing witnesses, petitioner's own statements and the testimony of a correction officer trained in recognizing gang materials, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Ortiz v. Fischer, 91 A.D.3d 1006, 935 N.Y.S.2d 914 [2012];Matter of Arrington v. Venettozzi, 87 A.D.3d 1215, 929 N.Y.S.2d 784 [2011] ). Petitioner's claim that the confiscated material was not gang-related and was simply “graffiti” presented a credibility issue to be resolved by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Ortiz v. Fischer, 91 A.D.3d at 1006, 935 N.Y.S.2d 914). Contrary to petitioner's argument, our review confirms that the determination of guilt resulted from the evidence presented at the hearing and not hearing officer bias ( see Matter of Alicea v. Fischer, 94 A.D.3d 1316, 1317, 942 N.Y.S.2d 690 [2012] ).

Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

LAHTINEN, J.P., SPAIN, MALONE JR., GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Chan RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

96 A.D.3d 1333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
946 N.Y.S.2d 908
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5228

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fischer

denied21 N.Y.3d 864, 973 N.Y.S.2d 87, 995 N.E.2d 1159 [2013] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the…

Stallone v. Fischer

While petitioner contends that he was improperly denied certain witnesses during the hearing addressing the…