From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Duggan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 12, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Dillon, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Memorandum: Defendants met their initial burden of establishing that Maria Rodriguez (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious physical injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Plaintiffs raised an issue of fact, however, by the affidavit of plaintiff's chiropractor, who stated that he measured significant restrictions in the flexion, extension and rotation of plaintiff's cervical spine 11 months after the accident and opined that those restrictions are permanent (see, Nathanson v. David, 244 A.D.2d 930).


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Duggan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Duggan

Case Details

Full title:MARIA RODRIGUEZ AND JUAN RODRIGUEZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MICHELLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 803

Citing Cases

Testa v. Allen

Plaintiff submitted the affirmation of her treating physician for four years following the motor vehicle…

Strangio v. T.M. Magaddino Vasquez

We agree, and we therefore reverse the order insofar as appealed from. With respect to the permanent…