From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1984
464 N.E.2d 989 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued March 19, 1984

Decided May 1, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Irwin Silbowitz, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Marvin R. Kwartler and Stephen J. McGrath of counsel), for City of New York, appellant.

Carol Mellor and Joseph Fallek for Richard Riccio, appellant.

Emilio Nunez and Fred R. Profeta, Jr., for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 92 A.D.2d 813). We add only that the evidence was sufficient to present a jury question as to appellant Riccio.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1984
464 N.E.2d 989 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARIA M. RODRIGUEZ, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 1, 1984

Citations

464 N.E.2d 989 (N.Y. 1984)
464 N.E.2d 989
476 N.Y.S.2d 291

Citing Cases

Young v. Koch

The Appellate Division, upon appeal by the City, declined to disturb the jury's imposition of liability…

Stemmer v. Stemmer

We agree with plaintiff that the trial court should have allowed that witness to testify. Defendant, by…