From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 2, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-753-CJC (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)

Summary

finding that the corpus delicti rule "is not grounded in federal law or the federal Constitution" and, consequently, "an alleged violation of this rule cannot form the basis of federal habeas relief."

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Arnold

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 12-753-CJC (PJW)

2013-10-02

JOSE CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

______________________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 2, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-753-CJC (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)

finding that the corpus delicti rule "is not grounded in federal law or the federal Constitution" and, consequently, "an alleged violation of this rule cannot form the basis of federal habeas relief."

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Arnold
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:JOSE CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 2, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. CV 12-753-CJC (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Arnold

AnalysisThis claim fails because the corpus delicti rule is purely a matter of state law and, as such,…

Hicks v. Paramo

The requirement that some independent evidence support a defendant's extrajudicial statement is, however,…