From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez-Rosas v. Barrett-Dietzius

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
313 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2859

12-18-2020

Daniel RODRIGUEZ-ROSAS and Guadalupe Rodriguez, Petitioners, v. Christel Ann BARRETT-DIETZIUS, Jeffrey Dean Adamson, Florida Investment Group, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, d/b/a Keller Williams Realty Gulf Coast, Florida Investment Group II, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Respondents.

Daniel Rodriguez-Rosas, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Petitioner Guadalupe Rodriguez. Mark D. Tinker and Rhianna L. Busch of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents.


Daniel Rodriguez-Rosas, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Petitioner Guadalupe Rodriguez.

Mark D. Tinker and Rhianna L. Busch of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez-Rosas v. Barrett-Dietzius

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 18, 2020
313 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Rodriguez-Rosas v. Barrett-Dietzius

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RODRIGUEZ-ROSAS and GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ, Petitioners, v. CHRISTEL…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

313 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)