From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodas v. Standard Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 10, 2015
Case No. EDCV 13-2203 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-2203 JGB (SPx)

09-10-2015

MAYRA RODAS, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation; UNITEDHEALTH GROUP LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, an ERISA plan; UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED, a corporation; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

In accordance with the Court's Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, the Court enters Judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this matter.

Defendants, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and UnitedHealth Group Long-Term Disability Plan (The Plan), shall pay to the Plaintiff all accrued unpaid benefits due to her during the 24 month "Own Occupation" period spanning from September 26, 2011 until September 26, 2013, plus 10% interest per annum pursuant to California Insurance Code § 10111.2. District courts have discretion to grant an award of prejudgment interest in ERISA matters to compensate a plaintiff for the loss incurred as a result of the defendants' nonpayment of benefits. Dishum v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 269 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2001). Defendants unreasonably denied Plaintiff's benefits, and as such, the equities of this case merit the application of the interest rate provided by California Insurance Code § 10111.2. See Arnett v. Hartford Life and Acc. Ins. Co., No. CV 05-01527 DDP (SHx), 2006 WL 5781982 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2006).

Plaintiff may file a properly supported motion for attorney's fees and costs, which the Court will consider in its discretion.

Plaintiff's claim is hereby referred to Standard Insurance Company to determine Plaintiff's eligibility for continued benefits during the "Any Occupation" period of the plan.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 10, 2015

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rodas v. Standard Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 10, 2015
Case No. EDCV 13-2203 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Rodas v. Standard Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MAYRA RODAS, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-2203 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Shaw v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Id. at *16 (“Although the disability standards used by the SSA and the Policy are different, Plaintiff's…

Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Although MetLife's termination decision is reviewed de novo, and not for abuse of discretion, the failure to…