From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rocklen's Auto Parts Service v. Rakiec

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Mar 18, 1986
506 A.2d 168 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)

Opinion

(4142)

Argued February 18, 1986 —

Decision released March 18, 1986

Action to recover amounts owed for merchandise purchased from the plaintiff, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven where the court, Flanagan, J., granted the plaintiff's motion for default and rendered judgment thereon; thereafter, the court denied the defendant's motion to open the judgment and the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

Howard A. Lawrence, for the appellant (defendant).

Robert A. DeMarco, with whom, on the brief, was Geoffrey A. Hecht, for the appellee (plaintiff).


Since the defendant failed to comply with the provisions of General Statutes 52-212 and Practice Book 377, the trial court was correct in refusing to grant the defendant's motion to open the judgment by default.


Summaries of

Rocklen's Auto Parts Service v. Rakiec

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Mar 18, 1986
506 A.2d 168 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)
Case details for

Rocklen's Auto Parts Service v. Rakiec

Case Details

Full title:ROCKLEN'S AUTO PARTS SERVICE, INC. v. STANLEY RAKIEC

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 18, 1986

Citations

506 A.2d 168 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)
6 Conn. App. 504

Citing Cases

Insurance Co. v. Waterfield

We have previously held that when a defendant fails to comply with the provisions of General Statutes §…

Ins. Co. of Pennsylvania v. Waterfield

We have previously held that, when a defendant fails to comply with the provisions of General Statutes §…