From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.

Supreme Court of California.
Sep 26, 2018
238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 (Cal. 2018)

Opinion

S249923

09-26-2018

ROCKEFELLER TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS (ASIA) VII v. CHANGZHOU SINOTYPE TECHNOLOGY CO.


The petition for review is granted. The parties are to brief and argue the following issue: Can private parties contractually agree to legal service of process by methods not expressly authorized by the Hague Convention?

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar and Kruger, JJ.


Summaries of

Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.

Supreme Court of California.
Sep 26, 2018
238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 (Cal. 2018)
Case details for

Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (ASIA) v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROCKEFELLER TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS (ASIA) VII v. CHANGZHOU SINOTYPE…

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Sep 26, 2018

Citations

238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 118 (Cal. 2018)
426 P.3d 303

Citing Cases

Trejo v. Schou

As they note only belatedly, in their reply brief, the Supreme Court has granted review in Rockefeller.…

Martinez v. Encore Senior Living, LLC

Although the California Supreme Court granted review in Rockefeller, its review appears to be limited to "the…