From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rock v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiffs commenced this action solely against Suffolk County on the theory of respondeat superior to recover damages allegedly caused by two Suffolk County Police Officers acting in the course of their employment. Contrary to the reasoning of the Supreme Court, the two officers are not necessary parties to this action (see, Cherney v. Board of Educ., 31 A.D.2d 764; Shaw v Village of Hempstead, 20 A.D.2d 663). The County's motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (10) and 1001 should therefore have been denied. Thompson, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rock v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Rock v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROCK et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

Trivedi v. Golub

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing…

Thomsen v. Suffolk

Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, however, the plaintiffs' failure to name individual police…