Opinion
2013-02-8
Emmelyn Logan–Baldwin, Rochester, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Christina A. Agola, PLLC, Rochester (Steven E. Laprade of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.
Emmelyn Logan–Baldwin, Rochester, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Christina A. Agola, PLLC, Rochester (Steven E. Laprade of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.
Present: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, and MARTOCHE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM:
Plaintiff commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that, during the course of her employment as a teacher at defendant Orleans Men's Correctional Facility, she was subjected to unlawful discrimination based upon sex, age and disability, and to retaliation for complaining about such discrimination. Patricia Townsend (defendant) was plaintiff's supervisor at the correctional facility. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's motion seeking, inter alia, to compel production of defendant's medical records. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to those records by disclosing them in an action commenced by defendant in federal court ( see Scinta v. Van Coevering, 284 A.D.2d 1000, 1001, 726 N.Y.S.2d 520), we conclude that plaintiff failed to meet her initial burden of making an evidentiary showing that defendant's medical condition is “in controversy” in this action (CPLR 3121[a]; see Dillenbeck v. Hess, 73 N.Y.2d 278, 287–288, 539 N.Y.S.2d 707, 536 N.E.2d 1126;Scinta, 284 A.D.2d at 1001, 726 N.Y.S.2d 520). The fact that defendant affirmatively placed her medical condition in controversy in the related action she commenced in federal court does not relieve plaintiff of her initial burden herein.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.