Opinion
Nos. 05-03-01664-CR, 05-03-01665-CR, 05-03-01666-CR
Opinion Filed September 28, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F98-54239-JK, F98-70075-IK, F98-70201-LK. Affirmed.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, BRIDGES, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Phillip Robinson, Jr. appeals three convictions for burglary of a habitation. The convictions arose after the trial court revoked appellant's deferred adjudication community supervision and adjudicated him guilty. In each case, the trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at confinement for life. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.