From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 10, 1925
106 So. 204 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

2 Div. 340.

November 10, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dallas County; S. F. Hobbs, Judge.

J. A. Robinson was convicted of practicing medicine without a license, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Robert G. Tate, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Appellant was not entitled to a discontinuance. Ex parte State, 115 Ala. 123, 22 So. 115; Drinkard v. State. 20 Ala. 9; Roszell v. State, 19 Ala. App. 462, 98 So. 35; Benson v. State, 91 Ala. 87, 8 So. 873; Ex parte Owens, 52 Ala. 473; Ex parte Remson, 31 Ala. 270; Forrester v. Forrester, 39 Ala. 320.


The mere fact that the cause had not been placed on the docket of the circuit court for two terms of court after indictment did not amount to a discontinuance. Roszell v. State, 19 Ala. App. 462, 98 So. 35.

The other questions raised in this record have been decided adversely to defendant in the case of Robinson v. State, ante, p. 168, 106 So. 203.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 10, 1925
106 So. 204 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 10, 1925

Citations

106 So. 204 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
21 Ala. App. 169

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

Affirmed. See, also, post, p. 169, 106 So. 204. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Robert G. Tate, Asst. Atty.…

Ex Parte State

Mere delay to docket case and call it for trial cannot operate a discontinuance. Forrester v. Forrester, 39…