Summary
In Robinson I, the court made no mention of the other departure reasons that were stated on the record by the trial court as part of the oral sentence.
Summary of this case from Robinson v. StateOpinion
No. 84-2098.
December 3, 1986.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Richard B. Burk, J.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Appellant Frank S. Robinson appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary and petit theft. We affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. First, the trial court erred by failing to include written reasons for departure from the sentencing guidelines. State v. Johnson, 486 So.2d 535 (Fla. 1986). Second, the trial court erred in using Robinson's habitual offender status as a reason for departure from the recommended guidelines sentence. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED for resentencing.
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.