From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Murphy

Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 2020
141 S. Ct. 972 (2020)

Summary

vacating District of New Jersey's order denying injunctive relief from executive orders, which limited occupancy for indoor religious-purpose gatherings and extended mask requirements to religious services, and ordering further consideration in light of Roman Cath. Dioceses ofBrooklyn

Summary of this case from Bormuth v. Whitmer

Opinion

No. 20A95.

12-15-2020

Kevin ROBINSON, et al., Applicants, v. Phil MURPHY, Governor of New Jersey, et al.


Application for injunctive relief, presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court, treated as petition for writ of certiorari before judgment, and petition granted. The October 2 order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo , 592 U.S. –––, 141 S.Ct. 63, 208 L.Ed.2d 206 (2020).


Summaries of

Robinson v. Murphy

Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 2020
141 S. Ct. 972 (2020)

vacating District of New Jersey's order denying injunctive relief from executive orders, which limited occupancy for indoor religious-purpose gatherings and extended mask requirements to religious services, and ordering further consideration in light of Roman Cath. Dioceses ofBrooklyn

Summary of this case from Bormuth v. Whitmer
Case details for

Robinson v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:Kevin ROBINSON, et al., Applicants, v. Phil MURPHY, Governor of New…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Dec 15, 2020

Citations

141 S. Ct. 972 (2020)
208 L. Ed. 2d 503

Citing Cases

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson

Such orders grant the petitions, vacate the district court orders, remand to the courts of appeals "with…

Solid Rock Baptist Church v. Murphy

In this motion, Plaintiffs requested that the Court reconsider its denial of Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion and…