From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Kenon

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 181 (N.C. Super. 1802)

Opinion

(Spring Riding, 1802.)

Contribution must be sought by a suit in equity. An action at law will not lie for it.


This is an action by one surety against another to recover a proportion of the moneys paid for the principal. There is no case to support such an action. That such an action is not (182) supportable was lately decided at Hillsborough. The plaintiff must resort to equity for a contribution or reimbursement.

Quere de hoc. Et vide 2 Bos. P., 368 to 274.

NOTE. — See Carrington v. Carson, 1 N.C. 410. But now, by the act of 1807 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 113, sec. 2), one surety may have an action at law against his cosurety.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Kenon

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1802
3 N.C. 181 (N.C. Super. 1802)
Case details for

Robinson v. Kenon

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON'S EXECUTORS v. KENON'S EXECUTORS

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1802

Citations

3 N.C. 181 (N.C. Super. 1802)