From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Oct 21, 1964
203 A.2d 907 (Md. 1964)

Opinion

[App. No. 41, September Term, 1964.]

Decided October 21, 1964.

DEFECTIVE DELINQUENTS — Evidence In Medical Reports Held Sufficient To Support Trial Court's Finding Here Of Defective Delinquency. p. 624

Decided October 21, 1964.

From a finding that he was a defective delinquent, Bernard Wm. Robinson applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.


This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency by Chief Judge Manley raises no question except the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. An allegation that the trial was in violation of rights guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments is too general to require an answer. We think the evidence in the medical reports was sufficient to support the trial court's finding, and the trial court was not clearly in error.

Application denied.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Director

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Oct 21, 1964
203 A.2d 907 (Md. 1964)
Case details for

Robinson v. Director

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON v . DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Oct 21, 1964

Citations

203 A.2d 907 (Md. 1964)
203 A.2d 907

Citing Cases

Johns v. Director

However, trials in defective delinquency cases are governed by the same procedural rules as those governing…