From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson-Reese v. Kopp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 2009
62 A.D.3d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-10477.

May 26, 2009.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated October 16, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Finder and Cuomo, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Sherri A. Jayson of counsel), for appellants.

Lufty Santora, Staten Island, N.Y. (Joseph Santora of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Balkin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the conflicting opinions of the defendants' and the plaintiff's experts ( see Roca v Perel, 51 AD3d 757; Bengston v Wang, 41 AD3d 625; Graham v Mitchell, 37 AD3d 408; Feinberg v Feit, 23 AD3d 517, 518; see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324).


Summaries of

Robinson-Reese v. Kopp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 2009
62 A.D.3d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Robinson-Reese v. Kopp

Case Details

Full title:INGER ROBINSON-REESE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM KOPP et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4221
878 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

N.Y. Sch. Ins. Reciprocal v. Milburn Sales Co.

The plaintiff appeals, and the defendant cross-appeals.In light of the conflicting expert affidavits…