Robertson v. Schiegger

Full title: ROGER WAYNE ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. JAMIE SCHIEGGER, et al., Respondents.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 4, 2015

2:15-cv-1860 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)

Opinion

ROGER WAYNE ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. JAMIE SCHIEGGER, et al., Respondents. No. 2:15-cv-1860 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 4, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.