Opinion
47993.
ARGUED MARCH 6, 1973.
DECIDED APRIL 4, 1973.
Condemnation of land. Coweta Superior Court. Before Judge Knight.
Haas, Holland, Levison Gibert, Richard N. Hubert, for appellant.
Sanders, Mottola, Haugen, Wood Goodson, Charles Van S. Mottola, for appellee.
The condemnee appeals from the judgment following an appeal from the award of a special master and from the denial of his motion for a new trial.
None of the condemnee's alleged errors were objected to in the court below and are therefore not subject to appellate review, with only one exception discussed below. Ocilla Truck c. Co. v. Nolan, 124 Ga. App. 417 ( 184 S.E.2d 48); Stiles v. Seagraves, 124 Ga. App. 389 ( 184 S.E.2d 45).
The condemnee contends that even though there was neither a request for nor any objection to the failure of the court to charge certain principles concerning opinion evidence, the instructions were grossly inadequate as a matter of law and should require a new trial under Code Ann. § 70-207 (c). We see no gross miscarriage of justice here to make that section applicable. The verdict was not only within the range of testimony on value, but was also virtually identical to the award of the special master. See Bryant v. Housing Authority of Atlanta, 121 Ga. App. 32 ( 172 S.E.2d 439).
The condemnee is left with only the issue of whether the evidence supports the verdict. It does. See also Derrick v. Rabun County, 107 Ga. App. 229 ( 129 S.E.2d 583); Roberts v. State Hwy. Dept., 54 Ga. App. 438 ( 188 S.E. 273).
Judgment affirmed. Evans and Clark, JJ., concur.