From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson Co. v. Beall

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
May 17, 1923
251 S.W. 1119 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. 1471.

April 19, 1923. Rehearing Denied May 17, 1923.

Appeal from Nolan County Court; A. S. Mauzey, Judge.

Action between the Robertson Company and J. H. Beall. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeals. Affirmed.

Wagstaff, Harwell Wagstaff, of Abilene, for appellant.

C. E. Mays, Jr., of Sweetwater, for appellee.


The first three items of expense mentioned in the third paragraph of the court's conclusions of law were not occasioned by unavoidable casualties within the meaning of the lease contract. Tays v. Ecker, 6 Tex. Civ. App. 188, 24 S.W. 954; Welles v. Castles, 3 Gray, (Mass.) 323. The tenant was therefore liable therefor.

As to the remaining item mentioned in said paragraph, the evidence supports the finding that it was not due to ordinary wear and tear.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Robertson Co. v. Beall

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
May 17, 1923
251 S.W. 1119 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)
Case details for

Robertson Co. v. Beall

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTSON CO. v. BEALL

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso

Date published: May 17, 1923

Citations

251 S.W. 1119 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Citing Cases

Hughes v. Svboda

" It was then said: "Though the provisions of the attachment laws of this state are very broad, we cannot…

Gill v. Physicians' Etc. Building

There remains then, of the grounds specified in the motion, only the objection to the jurisdiction, which is…