From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 25, 1965
23 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

February 25, 1965


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. The Court of Claims Judge not unreasonably requested submission of medical proof. It would seem that proof of disability during the 90-day period could have been readily supplied, if disability in fact existed, through hospital records or the affidavit of an attending physician. Under the circumstances of this case, and in the interest of justice, claimant should have the opportunity to supply the omission. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and application remitted to the Court of Claims for the reception of further proof or other proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roberts v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 25, 1965
23 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Roberts v. State

Case Details

Full title:SPENCER W. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

People v. Epakchi

In this case for example, the Appellate Term on remand is free to exercise its interest-of-justice power once…

People v. Epakchi

In this case for example, the Appellate Term on remand is free to exercise its interest-of-justice power once…